ISSCR MembersScientistsPublicMedia
 
The Basics
Beyond the Basics
Perspective
Glossary
FAQ
Make a Donation
About ISSCR
ISSCR Homepage

United States of America: Stem Cell Policies by State

Introduction
There is currently little federal legislation regarding hESC research in the USA. The most recent federal actions regulate eligibility of this research for federal funding rather than the research itself. In 2001, President George W. Bush ruled that federal funds may only be used for hESC research using specified pre-existing lines, now known as the ‘presidential’ hESC lines, and that no federal funds may be used to create new hESC lines. Legislation to expand the hESC research eligible for federal funding passed the House of Representatives and the Senate in 2006 but drew a Presidential veto. These efforts were renewed in early 2007 and remain underway. Read about ‘The Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act’.

In addition to federal legislation, research within the USA is subject to the laws of the individual fifty states. The issue of hESC research and the funding made available by the particular state for this research has been taken up independently by many states. Both federal and state policies are undergoing significant review. To view the policies of each state see the state-by-state table.

Policies on hESC cell research vary greatly from state to state. Since the first reports of hESC lines in 1998, some states, often those more permissive, have implemented or are considering specific legislation regarding hESC research. Some state laws that were passed prior to 1998, designed to oversee other procedures such as abortion or IVF, may be confusing in the context of hESC research and if strictly interpreted impose restrictions. This includes some abortion and fetal research statutes (e.g., in Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island) in which definitions of embryo, fetus, or “unborn child” have been interpreted by some, but not others, to restrict or prohibit any research use of human embryos.

Another contentious issue is NT, in which the DNA is removed from an oocyte and replaced with DNA from another cell, a technology researchers hope to use to develop patient-specific hESC lines and disease models. This is also referred to as somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), as the current application of this technology transfers DNA taken from a somatic cell (any cell that is not an egg or sperm).

With the current restrictions on the use of federal funding for research to derive new hESC lines or to use hESC lines created after August 2001, some states have taken initiatives or are considering action to promote this research. These actions have included laws passed by the state legislatures, voter ballot initiatives, and executive orders by state governors. Some states such as California, Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Jersey have enacted laws to expressly permit hESC and NT research, and in general these laws provide guidelines and limitations. In addition, some states such as California, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts and New Jersey have agreed to provide financial support for the research; New Jersey made its first stem cell grant awards in December 2005, Illinois followed in April 2006 and Connecticut in November, 2006.

Resources
The primary source of the information on existing and pending legislation included in the table is the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL, see link); note that the categories used in NCSL website tables are different from those used here (e.g., “Restricts research on fetus or embryo resulting from sources other than abortion” is broader than the more restrictive considerations for hESC and NT research in this table). Anyone with specific questions about the potential impact of existing laws on research within specific states, especially in cases in which legislative intent did not consider the use of embryos for stem cell research, should consult the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL, see link below) and speak with the appropriate offices at individual research institutions. Information about state initiatives for cord blood and placental stem cell research is not included in the table.

Links
US State Research Laws

National Conference of State Legislatures – State Embryonic and Fetal Research Legislation http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/genetics/embfet.htm

National Conference of State Legislatures – Human Cloning Legislation
http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/genetics/rt-shcl.htm

National Conference of State Legislatures – Pending Legislation http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/genetics/geneticsDB.cfm (search for “Research Issues”)

Coalition for the Advancement of Research Medicine (CAMR)
http://www.stemcellfunding.org/action_in_the_states.aspx

US Federal Research Laws

Coalition for the Advancement of Research Medicine (CAMR)
http://www.stemcellfunding.org/federal_legislation.aspx

Nuclear transfer is a technique in which the nucleus of a somatic cell (any cell of the body apart from the sperm or egg) is transferred into an egg that has had its original nucleus removed. The egg now has the same DNA, or genetic material, as the donor somatic cell. Given the right signals, the egg can be coaxed into developing as if it had been fertilized. The egg would divide to form two cells, then four cells, then eight cells and so on until the blastocyst is formed. Embryonic stem cells can be derived from this blastocyst to create cell lines that are genetically identical to the donor somatic cell. NT may also be referred to as Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer (SCNT) in other literature.

Acknowledgements
The ISSCR thanks Ann Carroll for the collation and descriptions of USA state legislations and ongoing support of these pages

Ann Carroll
ISSCR Public Education Committee

 

Back to Stem Cell Policies by State